|
|
|
"The Barefoot Running Book second edition" by Jason... order it via Amazon now! |
|
The Barefoot Running Book on Amazon paperback: Kindle: |
![]() |
|
|
Walmart Aqua Socks (a.k.a. water shoes, water socks, aqua shoes, calzado acuático, or whatever you want to call them) are an often-recommended minimalist shoe for new and experienced barefoot/minimalist shoe runners. Do they live up to the hype?
To find out, I
requested a pair from Walmart for this review. After months of cutting
through the bureaucratic red tape, I was on the verge of procuring a
pair when their background check on me revealed that I am a
pseudo-officer in my professional trade union. Instead of receiving a
pair of aqua socks, I received a letter warning me that Walmart would
eliminate all "Barefoot Runner" positions in stores world-wide if I
continued my subversive organized labor tactics.
Well, it
appeared as though I would have to buy them myself. I returned a
garbage bag full of beer bottles (the benefit of Michigan's $.10 deposit
on recyclable cans and bottles) to afford the steep $8 price tag. We'll
see how the 2010 incarnation of the Walmart Aqua Socks fare.

My History
with Walmart Aqua Socks
I'm very
familiar with Walmart aqua socks. When I began my barefoot journey, I
stumbled on the idea of using these on terrain that was too rough for
barefoot running. I bought about 10 pair of aqua socks from various
stores, including four pair from Walmart.
Those early
versions (circa 2006) weren't very good. They lasted about 150-200
miles, didn't fit well, and were butt-ass ugly. Their single redeeming
value- they were cheap. At only $5, I could afford to buy A
LOT. As soon as one pair wore out, I could replace them with minimal
expense.
I even ran a
50 mile trail ultra in these shoes. It was during this experience that
I fully realized the benefits and shortcomings of Walmart aqua socks.
The 2010
Version
The 2010
version isn't significantly different than the earlier version. They
now have a single velcro tab that does nothing to modify the fit of the
shoe. It appears to have been added for aesthetics and differentiate
the shoe from a slipper. Like the old version, this model consists of a
rubber sole with fairly aggressive traction and a stretchy fabric upper.
Sizing is
tricky. They are sold in a S,M,L, and XL version, each with an
approximate size. I normally wear a size 11, so I chose the "L" (11/12
according to the tag on the shoe.) This size is too large, but the "M"
is too small. A good rule of thumb with any minimalist shoe- go with
the larger size.
As I do with
all minimalist shoes, I removed the insoles for testing. I tried the
shoe with socks and without. I ran on asphalt, technical trails,
non-technical trails, hills, an indoor track, on snow, and through a
grassy field. This testing period confirmed that the Walmart aqua sock
has not changed in regards to function since my first experiences a few
years ago.
Positives
Ground feel-
This shoe ranks among the best I've tested in regards to ground feel.
Without the insole, it ranks slightly better than Vibram's KSO. If
ground feel is important, this would be an excellent shoe. If you are
looking for a shoe that offers superior protection, this shoe would be a
poor choice. I could easily feel every rock on the gravel roads.
Price-
They cost $8. Do I need to say more?
Potential
for Cold Weather Running- As of right now, I have not reviewed a
shoe that works very well in snow. This shoe has fairly aggressive
traction. When paired with a thermal sock, it is one of the better
winter shoes I've tried. Prior to finding KSOs and now Terra Plana's
EVO, this was my preferred winter running shoe.
Weight-
Surprisingly, these are the lightest aqua socks I have found to date.
Negatives
Quality-
They cost $8. Do I need to say more?
Actually, I
will make a few comments. I averaged about 160 miles from my previous
Walmart aqua socks. The sole would wear through after about 200 miles
on asphalt, but the upper had a tendency to fall apart earlier. The
2010 version suffers from the same lack of craftsmanship. This is a
poorly made product that is worth about $8.
Fit-
Unless you happen to have feet that fit perfectly in one of Walmart's
four sizes, this will be problematic. Aqua socks are good minimalist
shoes because they are light and flexible. They allow your foot to move
in a natural way by clinging like a glove. These particular aqua
socks work more like huaraches- they are loosely held to your foot.
Your foot will move around inside the shoe. The inner lining may cause
significant friction (i.e. blisters) as a result.
Aesthetics-
These are the ugliest of the aqua socks I have found. They look very
similar to bedroom slippers.
Hills-
This is related to fit, but deserves it's own section. Running uphill
in this shoe is not necessarily troublesome. Running down hill is. The
poor fit of this shoe allows your foot to slide forward inside the
shoe. This causes the top of your toes to strike the inside of the toe
box. Even though the shoe is constructed of a thin, flexible fabric, it
causes enough impact force to cause blackeded toenails. This was the
primary reason I switched to the better quality minimalist shoes (VFFS
and EVO.)
Performance
in wet conditions- This shoe performs about the same as my KSOs. If
they get wet, they drain quickly and will dry within about 30 minutes if
no socks are worn. Wet weather performance is good, but a few other
aqua socks perform better. Some have drainage holes in the sole, which
dramatically improve wet weather performance. The Walmart aqua socks
could benefit from that feature.
My
recommendation
This is not a
good shoe. However, the price makes it desirable to a few groups.
Brand new barefoot or minimalist shoe runners that are not running
significant mileage could use these instead of making an investment in
the pricier options. Road runners could use these if they do not
encounter many hills. Trail runners should avoid this particular aqua
sock unless the fit is perfect.
Aqua socks can
be a very good option. I will be reviewing another aqua sock in the
near future (produced by Wave Runner.) It is only $2.00 more than the
Walmart version, but offers many significant improvements. If you
decide to try aqua socks, shop around. The Walmart version should be a
last resort.